Re: Patch implementing DataContextDelegate

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 15:12:29 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "[APPLIED] Re: Patch implementing DataContextDelegate"

    Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > While we are discussing the whole delegate approach, I still think it
    > will be OK to apply your patch.
    >
    > Before I do that a quick question - any specific reason for allowing
    > multiple delegates. I think a single one should be enough. I guess this
    > is a conceptual thing. Single delegate makes behavior more predictable
    > for the user than it would be with chained delegates (things like
    > notification order, etc.). Also multiple delegates do not add much
    > value to the framework - if a user needs to, implementing "chaining"
    > inside the custom delegate is trivial.

    No, It just seemed more flexible. I'm only using a single delegate.

    -Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 30 2003 - 15:12:09 EDT