Just one more ;-)
I'm also using subclipse, subversion & TortoiseSVN exclusively for all my
work (not just source) and while subclipse has indeed matured to a more
than merely "usable" state, some things are not quite "there yet",
especially renaming & refactoring is still a little decoupled from the
rest of eclipse. Here's one story on subclipse-users (read Marks reply
too): http://subclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=2492
Other than that it's fine, and svn generally is much more predictable and
maintainable than CVS. Just use 1.2, fsfs and stay away from bdb..
Holger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 13 2005 - 15:19:00 EDT