On Sep 4, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Gili wrote:
> I meant...
>
> A contains a list of B
> B's relationship to A has a delete rule is set to "cascade"
>
> If I remember correctly, this is implemented by having column
> "A_id" in each B item.
>
> Now, when B is deleted and it tries to cascade the operation to
> A it'll find it can't delete it because A points to other Bs. In my
> use-case I'd want it to then "nullify" instead of "cascade".
Yes, a cascade rule makes no sense in the case when it points to the
"owner". Nullify would be a correct one.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 15:04:47 EDT