Mike,
IIRC the only backwards compatibility issue with version 1.2 was that
it required vpp jars in runtime (anything else?) and I think we can
figure out some mechanism to hide VPP dependency if it is not
available in runtime.
If that's the case, I'd say we should drop 1.1 all together. Am I
being too optimistic?
Andrus
On Nov 4, 2005, at 2:30 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Andrus,
>
> How do you feel about switching the default cgen version (and the 1.2
> modeler) from v1.1 over to v1.2?
>
> At this point, it's well-tested, and should be producing better code
> than cgen v1.1.
>
> Maybe from a backwards-compatibility standpoint, it makes more sense
> to just switch the modeler over, though, since that won't break
> anyone's ant scripts. However, that'd give two different generated
> results depending on whether someone was using the modeler or ant to
> generate their classes.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Nov 04 2005 - 03:03:06 EST