Re: cgen

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 04 2005 - 11:29:41 EST

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: CVS reorg notice [Was: Mixing JDK 1.4 and 1.5 in development]"

Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Reply: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/4/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> What if we simply stick "classGen" key in 1.2 context?

Only if you promise to remove it in 1.3 :)

I guess it won't hurt, but I dislike the idea. I can't think of any
technical reasons why it can't be done, though.

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: CVS reorg notice [Was: Mixing JDK 1.4 and 1.5 in development]"
Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Reply: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: cgen"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Nov 04 2005 - 11:29:47 EST