In all the confusion of this issue, I've lost track of what the
intended goal here is :)
As of now, 1.2 supports postgres sequences with no problems. Can you
summarize what you want to accomplish on top of this?
Cris
On 12/9/05, Kevin Menard <kmenar..ervprise.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/05 9:57 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> > I think you don't need to access DataNode from DbAdapter.
> > "org.objectstyle.cayenne.dba.PkGenerator" is already an attribute of
> > DbAdapter.
> >
> > On a side note, it was bad decision made back in the day when we
> > chose to reuse the runtime Cayenne access stack objects for Swing
> > model. It was supposed to save time, instead it created a bit of a
> > mess in the Modeler.
>
> Well, it's been a little while, but I'm digging my heels back in for this
> one. Given that there's a lot about the internals that I still don't quite
> get, I'm just going to think out loud a bit here and ramble off some
> observations I've made. If I'm off base, please chime in.
>
>
> DbAdapter does indeed have a way to retrieve a PkGenerator, but there is no
> corresponding set method.
>
> JdbcAdapter does have a setter for the PkGenerator and while I believe every
> adapter extends from it, I can't use it when programming with the DbAdapter
> interface.
>
> What it seems would be necessary is to either pull up the setter method,
> which means an API change people will need to be aware of. The effect
> within Cayenne will be minimal since JdbcAdapter already has an
> implementation. Alternatively, the db adapters could pull their PkGenerator
> out of the DataNode themselves, but then would require a reference to said
> node.
>
> With dependency injection being the new guy in town, it would seem the first
> option would be the best. So, would pulling that setter method up to the
> interface level be welcomed? If so, I can just do it here and include it in
> my changeset. Otherwise, I'm open to other suggestions.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Dec 09 2005 - 14:32:23 EST