That's cool, too. You are more familiar with the workings of Confluence
than me. We can always put references to the other documentation spaces
on the main documentation page.
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:40 PM
To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
Subject: Re: New Doc space
I guess the idea is that there is no release mixing within one space.
In other words a space is a branch.
CAYDOC Space == HEAD in CVS
CAYDOC## Space == STABLE-## branch in CVS
In the future when we branch 1.2 to STABLE-1.2, we will
simultaneously create a copy of CAYDOC to a new CAYDOC12 space, and
will continue new doc work in CAYDOC.
Also it doesn't make sense now to port back 1.1 docs in its own
space, so I suggest we start with HEAD version of the docs.
Andrus
On Feb 7, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> Should we have "Cayenne 1.1" and "Cayenne 1.2" top-level folders?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
> Subject: New Doc space
>
>
> I just created a new CAYDOC space. It has the same permissions as CAY
> space.
>
> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Home
>
> Would anyone volunteer to convert our XML docs from CVS to Confluence
> format and load them in?
>
> There is already a Velocity template that converts XML to HTML under
> cayenne-other/xdocs/stylesheets/cayenne.vsl. I hope it can be tweaked
> to generate much simpler confluence markup.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
>
>> On 2/7/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
>>>
>>>> We talked about this a while ago, but it kind of fizzled out I
>>>> think... maybe its time to move the documentation into the wiki.
>>>> WebWork does it in a separate space and exports the space to HTML
>>>> for
>>>> each release, so that you have "versioned" documentation. I
>>>> think it
>>>> would be worth considering starting a space in the wiki to do just
>>>> this.
>>>
>>> I am still entertaining this idea... How do they handle two branches
>>> of documentation? What if we have to do releases of say 1.2 and 2.0
>>> in parallel for some time. I guess once a stable release is
>>> branched,
>>> we can copy the entire space to a separate "branch" space, and keep
>>> the main doc space up to date with HEAD?
>>>
>> I think copying the space would be the way to go. There's page level
>> versioning, but no space-level tagging/branching that would allow us
>> to concurrently manage the documentation in the same space.
>> Copying is
>> pretty simple though, and major releases don't happen often.
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 07 2006 - 15:54:50 EST