Re: Non-physical delete... again

From: Andrey Razumovsky (razumovsky.andre..mail.com)
Date: Wed Jun 03 2009 - 05:01:27 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Non-physical delete... again"

    I've never used that myself, but e.g. DeleteBatchQuery can be fired
    separately using context.performAction(..). It is public in .query package
    after all. I don't want to have different behaviors for that

    2009/6/3 Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>

    > Let me rephrase. What other cases do we want to handle with this strategy,
    > in addition to "commit" (that triggers flush action)?
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    >
    > On Jun 3, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >> On Jun 3, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
    >>
    >> Yes, but that will make factory working only in flush action, but not if
    >>> it
    >>> is fired from somewhere else.
    >>>
    >>
    >> Correct. But why do we want to do it differently?
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 03 2009 - 05:02:03 EDT