Actually "localObject" is too loaded, performing a set of vaguely
related distinct tasks... It has to be split into multiple methods
(and IIRC we discussed it briefly some time ago). This particular
variety is closer to "merge", vs. "localObject(id, null)" which is
something like "locate"... Since this is rather visible public API and
there are some caveats, we need to give it some more thought I think,
identifying all the scenarios before creating appropriate methods.
Andrus
On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Would it make sense to add:
>
> public Persistent localObject(Persistent source)
> {
> return localObject(source.getObjectId(), source)
> }
>
> to DataContext and friends? We are starting to use that a bit here
> and it seems like it would be much simpler to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jul 09 2010 - 14:52:27 UTC