Re: WOLips 0.9.2 and status + WOProject/WOLips success stories

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..ssense.com)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 16:18:26 EST

  • Next message: Ulrich Köster: "Re: Eclipse on OSX - setting a different workspace?"

    Am Donnerstag, 21.11.02 um 20:11 Uhr schrieb Ian McDougall:

    >>
    >> Hi Ian,
    >>
    >> I think we should put this thread public.
    >
    > If you think it'll do good, then I agree.
    >
    >
    >>>> Any feature requests for 0.9.3?
    >>>
    >>>> From my point of view, I have two feature requests:
    >>>
    >>> - allowing of a more dynamic project structure. i.e. allow source
    >>> directories anywhere in project and have PB.project update properly.
    >>> The
    >>> PBIndex ant task would be sufficient for this. I'm spending more and
    >>> more
    >>> time wrestling with trying to synchronize the PB.project files lately
    >>> in 4
    >>> projects and 7 subprojects. Unfortunately, I came on board around
    >>> the
    >>> 0.8.7
    >>> release and have already CVS'd the project which uses a 'src'
    >>> directory in
    >>> each project and subproject.
    >> This is the point "dynamically resolve the src folder". I hope this
    >> get
    >> fixed soon. It is important that you report problems early. If we see
    >> something is important , there is a very good chance that it get in
    >> next release.
    >
    > This would be very nice. The primary issue I can see is this: where
    > do the
    > java files for a new component go? How will WOLips know where the
    > source
    > forder is for the current project? (or more importantly, subproject?)
    > Will
    > there be a WOLips config entry in .properties that states the projects,
    > subprojects, and their associated source folders? That would then make
    > putting a component's .java files in the .wo directory nearly
    > impossible (or
    > at least quite complicated).
    That`s the reason for the src folder name.
    >
    >> From what I've seen, the best bet would be to put all .java files
    >> into one
    > source directory, and have a WOLips view which groups components and
    > java
    > together (as I mentioned before ;) )
    >
    >
    >>>
    >>> - Documentation. What does target builder do? I dunno. I'd dive
    >>> into the
    >>> code, but I really don't have time. I think this has the potential
    >>> to
    >>> be
    >>> _very_ big in the WO community, and I'd hate to see you adopt Apple's
    >>> previous stance on documentation ;). I'm trying to get all WO
    >>> developers at
    >>> our shop over onto Eclipse, but I don't want to spend a day trying to
    >>> explain to them how Eclipse works.
    >> The targetbuilder can build different targets within Eclipse. This is
    >> usefull for developing JavaClientApplications. I wish we have more
    >> time
    >> for WOLips. So things will improve with every release.
    >
    > I'm guessing that target building is more of an PBX concept than a
    > PBWO.
    > Moving forward is always a good thing when it comes to docs. ;)
    May be Uwe can tell more about the target builder.
    >
    >>> Another request would be to dynamically resolve all components,
    >>> api's,
    >>> and
    >>> source into one consolidated view, regardless of their location in
    >>> the
    >>> project (logical vs. physical view). As I mentioned, our project is
    >>> quite
    >>> wide spread, and much time is spent jumping between .java and .wod
    >>> files.
    >>> Maybe even a popup command that jumps to the associated .java or .wod
    >>> file
    >>> for the currently highlighted file would be a great start.
    >> Currently I`m setting up a draft for it. It drives me crazy too.
    >
    > We have a WOLips perspective, but a WOLips view would be most useful.
    >
    >>>
    >>> I'm slowly trying to look at the code to see if I can be of some
    >>> help.
    >>> I
    >>> feel bad asking others to do all the work. Perhaps I can be of some
    >>> development help in the future. This is the first open source
    >>> project
    >>> I've
    >>> come across that I really have interest in, and a need for!
    >> You are welcome :-). For me this is a thing I would pay for. Share
    >> your
    >> ideas, questions, bugs.... . and time.
    >
    > I would be willing to pay for it as well.
    >
    >>> PS. the build scripts are seriously broken for windows development.
    Could you send me the log?
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Nov 21 2002 - 16:18:52 EST