There is a supported template syntax that does just about that -- read the
part of the release notes that covers J2EE/JSP integration ...
Harald
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Gruber" <cgrube..srafil.net>
To: "'Anjo Krank'" <anjo.kran..-online.de>; "'Anders Peterson'"
<anders_peterso..ptimatika.se>
Cc: "'Ulrich Köster'" <ulric..ssense.com>; "'Euan Maxwell'"
<eua..amvista.net>; <woproject-dev@objectstyle.org>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: [webobjects-newbies] Re: WebObjects development under
Linux/WINE?
> I'm pretty sure I'm not comfortable with that. I do like the
> separation. We just need a tool to handle the different parts.
>
> They are different in meaning. Static binding, run-time
> pre-configuration, view, and controller (the .java).
>
> Cg.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anjo Krank [mailto:anjo.kran..-online.de]
>
> Another thing I thought about was to create a template parser that will
> do away with the unnerving .wo wrapper and the seperation of .wod, .woo
> and .html and create only one HTML file with a syntax like <table
> id=someName width=someBinding webobjects=SomeTableClass> and
> <webobjects:SomeCustomClass id=someOtherName > to better integrate into
> existing tools like DreamWeaver. However, this would make development
> even more proprietary than it is now even if it would be easy to write
> a conversion script for all the existing elements.
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Dec 13 2002 - 19:10:49 EST