WOLips vs. d2wmodel files

From: Pierre Bernard (Pierre.Bernar..cl.lu)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 09:50:55 EST

  • Next message: Ulrich Köster: "Re: WOLips vs. d2wmodel files"

    Hi!

    I just noticed that WOLips omits copying D2W model files from the project directory to the resources directory. Correcting this was easy: I just added the necessary include rule to the resources tag nested in the woapplication task.

                               <resources dir=".">
                                    <include name="Properties"/>
                                       <include name="**/*.eomodeld/"/>
                                   <include name="**/*.wo/"/>
                                   <include name="**/*.api"/>
                                   <include name="**/*.strings"/>
                                   <include name="**/*.d2wmodel"/>
                                   <exclude name="**/*.eomodeld~/"/>
                                   <exclude name="**/*.woa/**"/>
                           </resources>

    I guess this should be done by default for all WOLips projects.

    However, for certain things to work, I need the D2W model files to be listed as resources in the PB.project. Unfortunately I can't figure out how to go about modifying what is added to the PB.project. Is this done in code?

    TIA
    Pierre.

    **********************************************************************
    This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
    the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
    If you have received this email in error please notify the sender
    of this message. (Pierre.Bernar..cl.lu)
    This email message has been checked for the presence of computer
    viruses; however this protection does not ensure this message is
    virus free.
    Banque centrale du Luxembourg; Tel ++352-4774-1; http://www.bcl.lu
    **********************************************************************



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 09:52:57 EST