Re: CVS and *.eomodeld~ files

From: Anders Peterson (anders_peterso..ptimatika.se)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 14:56:03 EST

  • Next message: Harald Niesche: "Re: CVS and *.eomodeld~ files"

    Re incremental builder...

    Is this based on work you did independant of WOProject/WOLips?

    Building incrementally is an alternative to building with Ant?

    What are the pros and cons?

    /Anders

    On onsdag, feb 26, 2003, at 20:08 Europe/Stockholm, Harald Niesche
    wrote:

    > Yeah, right. I just recall that we talked about having a Unified
    > builder
    > installed that either builds via Ant or incrementally.
    >
    > Harald
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Ulrich Köster" <ulric..ssense.com>
    > To: "Harald Niesche" <haral..heCo.de>
    > Cc: "Anders Peterson" <anders_peterso..ptimatika.se>; "Dirk Olmes"
    > <dirk.olme..mx.de>; <woproject-dev@objectstyle.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:46 PM
    > Subject: Re: CVS and *.eomodeld~ files
    >
    >
    > A builder will only help if this builder is installed and activated for
    > the project.
    >
    > Ulrich
    >
    > Am Mittwoch, 26.02.03 um 18:42 Uhr schrieb Harald Niesche:
    >
    >> we could do that in the incremental build ...
    >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> From: "Ulrich Köster" <ulric..ssense.com>
    >> To: "Anders Peterson" <anders_peterso..ptimatika.se>
    >> Cc: "Dirk Olmes" <dirk.olme..mx.de>; <woproject-dev@objectstyle.org>
    >> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:06 PM
    >> Subject: Re: CVS and *.eomodeld~ files
    >>
    >>
    >>> Hi,
    >>>
    >>> Hmm I can`t reproduce this on our machines.
    >>> How about a resource listener that removes the cvs stuff from
    >>> *.emodeld~ for us?
    >>>
    >>> Any volunteers?
    >>>
    >>> Ulrich
    >>>
    >>> Am Mittwoch, 26.02.03 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Anders Peterson:
    >>>
    >>>> Dirk Olmes wrote:
    >>>>>> I have seen odd things happening with eomodel files. I
    >>>>>> occasionally
    >>>>>> had the
    >>>>>> impression of having to make the same changes twice. Wonder if
    >>>>>> this
    >>>>>> is related to
    >>>>>> CVS getting confused?
    >>>>> Not CVS ... well not really. It's just that the backup eomodel also
    >>>>> has the CVS info in it which confuses Eclipse.
    >>>>>> Should nobody have a clean reliable fix, an option would be to add
    >>>>>> an ant task to
    >>>>>> the build process that removes all CVS directories from the
    >>>>>> *.eomodeld~ directories.
    >>>>> That's what I do now - although manually. If you remove the
    >>>>> .eomodeld~ before checkin no confusion happens .-)
    >>>>
    >>>> It's best to do this 'outside' eclipse. Otherwise eclipse may think
    >>>> you want to delete something from CVS (I've had that happen).
    >>>>
    >>>> Letting the (some) Ant script handle this may be a solution.
    >>>>
    >>>> /Anders
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 26 2003 - 14:58:46 EST