----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Edward Gruber" <cgrube..srafil.net>
To: "'Anders Peterson'" <anders_peterso..ptimatika.se>; "'Ulrich Köster'"
<ulric..bjectstyle.org>
Cc: <woproject-de..bjectstyle.org>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: cvs, branches and co
> I'd suggest we not tag the repository for every build, especially
> nightly builds (if we do them), as it will make the CVS repository very
> very messy. For nightly, we can "reclaim" the build by having a
> particular time of day (in absolute time) at which the build is fetched
> for building, so we can always re-fetch it from a given day at that
> time. No CVS required.
This also means that "AntHill" only needs to access CVS anonymously. Nothing
needs to be written to CVS.
> Of course stable/integration and release builds should be tagged, and
> release builds should obviously be branched for bug-fixes.
Basically we'll do everything just like we do now, but with 2 additions:
1) When we make releases we tag and branch CVS.
2) Automatic builds will add a timestamp to the build result (to the the
name of the *.tar.gz file).
/Anders
> Thoughts on the "tag on every build" issue?
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anders Peterson [mailto:anders_peterso..ptimatika.se]
> >
> > Everytime we build we tag CVS with a serial number (and date).
> > The WOLips version exposed to Eclipse will be the same for several
> > builds, and has nothing to do with the build number. Just like we've
> > been using WOLips 1.0.0 for a while now.
> > A release is made when/if the build works as expected, and there is a
> > CVS tag/branch for every released version.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 16:32:08 EDT