Re: cvs, branches and co

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Apr 08 2003 - 09:23:45 EDT

  • Next message: Harald Niesche: "Re: cvs, branches and co"

    Hi,

    the buildserver should at least tag the weekly builds. If for instance
    somebody reports a bug in a weekly build, I need a way to get that
    version and a version before the bug occured. Without tags this could
    be complicated. The nightly builds are good for the build reports and
    unit tests.

    Ulrich

    Am Montag, 07.04.03 um 23:00 Uhr schrieb Christian Edward Gruber:

    > Makes sense to me.
    >
    > P.S. When I said, no CVS required, I meant no CVS tag required. <doh>
    >
    > Cg.
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Anders Peterson [mailto:anders_peterso..ptimatika.se]
    >>
    >> Basically we'll do everything just like we do now, but with 2
    > additions:
    >> 1) When we make releases we tag and branch CVS.
    >> 2) Automatic builds will add a timestamp to the build result (to the
    > the
    >> name of the *.tar.gz file).
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 08 2003 - 09:28:47 EDT