On tisdag, apr 8, 2003, at 15:23 Europe/Stockholm, Ulrich Köster wrote:
> the buildserver should at least tag the weekly builds. If for instance
> somebody reports a bug in a weekly build, I need a way to get that
> version and a version before the bug occured. Without tags this could
> be complicated. The nightly builds are good for the build reports and
> unit tests.
Checking out from CVS you can normally specify a branch, tag or a
timestamp. Being able to specify a date would be all we need since the
build names include a timestamp. The Eclipse CVS client doesn't seem to
support this. It needs a branch or a version (tag) - have I missed
something?
Wont it be enough if we tag every release, incl. bug fix releases, and
branch on new feature releases (when/if we need to fix bugs in that
release)?
How often do we expect to build compared to making bug fixes releases?
/Anders
> Am Montag, 07.04.03 um 23:00 Uhr schrieb Christian Edward Gruber:
>
>> Makes sense to me.
>>
>> P.S. When I said, no CVS required, I meant no CVS tag required. <doh>
>>
>> Cg.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Anders Peterson [mailto:anders_peterso..ptimatika.se]
>>>
>>> Basically we'll do everything just like we do now, but with 2
>> additions:
>>> 1) When we make releases we tag and branch CVS.
>>> 2) Automatic builds will add a timestamp to the build result (to the
>> the
>>> name of the *.tar.gz file).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 08 2003 - 11:55:48 EDT