A couple of things to try to get more information on the launch failure...
1. Add this to the launch arguments in Monitor and try to start the instance:
1>/tmp/launch.txt 2>&1
This will record what happens while the Java process is being launched
and will show failures due to classpath problems etc.
2. Add logging to the public static void main(String argv[]) method to log
interesting information. NSLog may not be functional this early in the
process so try using System.out.println and output redirection as in the
previous step, or add code like this to sent logging information to a file:
FileWriter fos = null;
try
{
fos = new FileWriter("C:/temp/PostLaunch.txt");
fos.write("Starting....\n");
fos.write(<whatever else you need to log>);
fos.flush();
fos.close();
WOApplication.main(argv, Application.class);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
System.out.println(e);
}
FWIW
Chuck
At 03:25 PM 30/07/2003 -0400, Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
>Hi Marc,
>
> I have exactly the same problem, and have had for months, but have
>temporarily given up on it pending more time to fix it. What is
>maddening, is that no matter how much I fiddle with the log settings in
>JavaMonitor, I can't get ANY debug output - only the file being created.
>It's always empty. I've taken to starting at the command-line and
>piping all output into a log file and using logadm to manage the file,
>but I won't really be able to get the whole load-balancing ecosystem to
>work if I can't even get JavaMonitor to start an instance.
>
> I hadn't tried building from project builder, because we're in an
>all-eclipse environment. That's a new and important clue.
>
>Christian.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Respass [mailto:mar..arcrespass.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:09 PM
>> To: Ulrich Köster
>> Cc: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
>> Subject: Re: Can't start with JavaMonitor
>>
>>
>> Hi Ulrich,
>>
>> This is WO 5.2.1. I don't know what resources are missing. I
>> can't find
>> any difference. I agree that the build scripts seem to be identical
>> which is why I wonder if anyone else has seen this problem. I
>> don't get
>> any logs written so I can't even figure out what is happening.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 01:08 PM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Marc,
>> >
>> > is this with WO 5.1 or 5.2? I've tested it with WO5.2 and the
>> > buildscripts seems to be identically.
>> >
>> > Of what kind is the missing resource?
>> >
>> > Ulrich
>> >
>> > On Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2003, at 17:17 Uhr, Marc Respass wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm using Eclipse 2.1.1 and WOLips 1.0.4 on Mac OS X (10.2.6). I'm
>> >> building on Mac OS X and copying the build to Solaris to
>> test. When I
>> >> build with Eclipse, the application starts at the command
>> line but it
>> >> will not start with JavaMonitor. I tested this a lot. What
>> does work
>> >> is to import the PB.project into Project Builder and build
>> using PBX.
>> >> Then I copy the build to Solaris and it starts in JavaMonitor.
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone else experienced this? Is there something that I'm not
>> >> doing? I admit that I've only read enough docs to get
>> builds working
>> >> locally in Eclipse. I cannot figure out what is wrong but
>> I know that
>> >> if I build using PBX, everything works fine. If I build
>> with Eclipse,
>> >> it will not start in JavaMonitor. Also, I have not tested
>> enough but
>> >> my application would not find its resources in a framework
>> built with
>> >> Eclipse. I built it with PBX and deployed and it worked. I notice
>> >> that a WO framework directory is a little different if
>> built from PBX
>> >> and though it *shouldn't* matter it does seem to for me.
>> >>
>> >> Any help is greatly appreciated. We will be moving to full
>> ant builds
>> >> using woproject and building on Solaris instead of the
>> build and copy
>> >> we do now so maybe that is the real solution.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Marc
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
--Chuck Hill chil..lobal-village.net Global Village Consulting Inc. http://www.global-village.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 15:34:17 EDT