Re: RFC "ant" folder name

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2004 - 13:35:47 EDT

  • Next message: Ulrich Köster: "Re: Problem building applications"

    That means we have to provide tasks to read the stuff from the
    build.properties.

    Ulrich

    Am 20.07.2004 um 18:31 schrieb Anders Peterson:

    > ?
    >
    > To me 1 build.xml file comes with 1 build.properties file. Ideally all
    > customizations are done using the build.properties file. Am I the only
    > one using Ant this way?
    >
    > /Anders
    >
    > On 2004-07-20, at 17.48, Pierre Frisch wrote:
    >
    >> No please. The build.properties is a remnant of the pasty I would
    >> vote to deprecate it. This file create a common point between
    >> multiple projects that do not necessarily need to share anything. On
    >> top of this it is stored at the wrong place on MacOSX (it should be
    >> in the ~/Library/something)
    >>
    >> Pierre
    >> On Jul 20, 2004, at 7:30, Anjo Krank wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Am 20.07.2004 um 15:22 schrieb Anders Peterson:
    >>>
    >>>> Why can't these patternsets be defined in the build.properties file?
    >>>
    >>> That's a great idea!
    >>>
    >>> Cheers, Anjo
    >>>
    >>>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jul 20 2004 - 13:33:15 EDT