Re: RFC "ant" folder name

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2004 - 14:05:25 EDT

  • Next message: Ulrich Köster: "Re: Problem building applications"

    Hi,

    how should we call the baby? Not ant, not?

    Some suggestions please, otherwise I ask the registrar for a name :-)

    Ulrich

    Am 20.07.2004 um 19:35 schrieb Ulrich Köster:

    > That means we have to provide tasks to read the stuff from the
    > build.properties.
    >
    > Ulrich
    >
    > Am 20.07.2004 um 18:31 schrieb Anders Peterson:
    >
    >> ?
    >>
    >> To me 1 build.xml file comes with 1 build.properties file. Ideally
    >> all customizations are done using the build.properties file. Am I the
    >> only one using Ant this way?
    >>
    >> /Anders
    >>
    >> On 2004-07-20, at 17.48, Pierre Frisch wrote:
    >>
    >>> No please. The build.properties is a remnant of the pasty I would
    >>> vote to deprecate it. This file create a common point between
    >>> multiple projects that do not necessarily need to share anything. On
    >>> top of this it is stored at the wrong place on MacOSX (it should be
    >>> in the ~/Library/something)
    >>>
    >>> Pierre
    >>> On Jul 20, 2004, at 7:30, Anjo Krank wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Am 20.07.2004 um 15:22 schrieb Anders Peterson:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Why can't these patternsets be defined in the build.properties
    >>>>> file?
    >>>>
    >>>> That's a great idea!
    >>>>
    >>>> Cheers, Anjo
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jul 20 2004 - 14:02:52 EDT