Re: Prototypes in Cayenne?

From: Denise Howard (dhowar..gp.com)
Date: Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:07:54 EDT

  • Next message: James Cicenia: "Not Deploying {more info}"

    Yes, since it's all XML files.

    Denise

    On 10/29/04 1:00 PM, "Brendan Duddridge" <brendan@clickspace.com> wrote:

    > Hi Denise,
    >
    > I guess that makes perfect sense. I'm unfortunately not at all familiar with
    > Cayenne's modeler. Is it compatible with EOModeler's data model format?
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > ___________________________
    >
    > Brendan Duddridge
    >
    > ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    > Suite L100
    > 239 - 10th Ave SE
    > Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    > Canada
    > (403) 277-5591
    > http://www.clickspace.com/
    >
    >
    >> From: Denise Howard <dhoward@pgp.com>
    >> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:56:05 -0700
    >> To: Brendan Duddridge <brendan@clickspace.com>,
    >> <woproject-dev@objectstyle.org>
    >> Subject: Re: Prototypes in Cayenne?
    >>
    >> Here's an example. Suppose you have a DBA who's in charge of your database.
    >> You want to put him in charge of maintaining the data model, too. But he
    >> uses Linux. So you can't just have him install WO. Nor does he want all
    >> the WO stuff anyway--he just wants the modeler. Enter Cayenne.
    >>
    >> Denise
    >>
    >> On 10/29/04 11:38 AM, "Brendan Duddridge" <brendan@clickspace.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hi,
    >>>
    >>>> And I wouldn't say we're abandoning WebObjects--we're just trying to move
    >>>> toward tools that allow folks without WebObjects expertise to help with the
    >>>> workload! Cayenne is a step in that direction.
    >>>
    >>> So what's the difference? Don't you need to then have people who know
    >>> Cayenne? I'm sure there's more WO developers than Cayenne developers out
    >>> there. Correct me if I'm wrong.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> ___________________________
    >>>
    >>> Brendan Duddridge
    >>>
    >>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    >>> Suite L100
    >>> 239 - 10th Ave SE
    >>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    >>> Canada
    >>> (403) 277-5591
    >>> http://www.clickspace.com/
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> From: Denise Howard <dhoward@pgp.com>
    >>>> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:10:17 -0700
    >>>> To: Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>,
    >>>> <woproject-dev@objectstyle.org>
    >>>> Subject: Re: Prototypes in Cayenne?
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks Andrus--I just filed a feature request in JIRA.
    >>>>
    >>>> And I wouldn't say we're abandoning WebObjects--we're just trying to move
    >>>> toward tools that allow folks without WebObjects expertise to help with the
    >>>> workload! Cayenne is a step in that direction.
    >>>>
    >>>> Denise
    >>>>
    >>>> On 10/28/04 5:11 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andrus@objectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Hi Denise,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I am all for it. Opening a JIRA feature request and/or posting your
    >>>>> ideas (if not the implementation) on Cayenne mailing list will go a
    >>>>> long way in making that a higher priority.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Oh, and I don't want to go on the record advocating abandoning
    >>>>> WebObjects, as I am not (providing an alternative doesn't count ;-)).
    >>>>> Use what you feel is best for your business.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Cheers,
    >>>>> Andrus
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On Oct 28, 2004, at 7:45 PM, Denise Howard wrote:
    >>>>>> Are there any plans to support prototypes in Cayenne, as EOModeler
    >>>>>> does?
    >>>>>> Now that we are sold on the value of prototypes, this is the one hitch
    >>>>>> keeping us from dropping EOModeler in favor of Cayenne.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Denise
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> ________________________________________________________________
    >>>> This message could have been secured by PGP Universal. To secure
    >>>> future messages from this sender, please click this link:
    >>>>
    >>>> woproject-dev@objectstyle.org">https://keys.pgp.com/b/b.e?r=woproject-dev@objectstyle.org
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ________________________________________________________________
    >> This message could have been secured by PGP Universal. To secure
    >> future messages from this sender, please click this link:
    >>
    >> brendan@clickspace.com">https://keys.pgp.com/b/b.e?r=brendan@clickspace.com
    >>
    >
    >

    ________________________________________________________________
    This message could have been secured by PGP Universal. To secure
    future messages from this sender, please click this link:

    woproject-dev@objectstyle.org">https://keys.pgp.com/b/b.e?r=woproject-dev@objectstyle.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 29 2004 - 16:08:07 EDT