Thanks for your replies Chuck & Harald.
I've had no success so far. I've included the following in by build.xml
file:
<target name="generate.eos">
<taskdef name="wogen"
classname="org.objectstyle.woproject.ant.WOGenerator">
</taskdef>
<wogen map="cwuktest.eomodeld" destDir="src" usepkgpath="false"/>
</target>
And get the following error:
Buildfile: c:\dev\wo\IndexPlay\build.xml
generate.eos:
[wogen] Error generating classes
BUILD FAILED: C:\dev\wo\IndexPlay\build.xml:96: Error generating classes
Total time: 704 milliseconds
I've no idea what to try next so I'm going to give eogenerator a go.
Cheers,
Lance
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Niesche [mailto:haral..heco.de]
Sent: 28 December 2004 11:32
To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
Cc: Lance French
Subject: Re: Queries about WOLips, EOModeler & Ant
Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Lance French wrote:
>> I use the Wizard to create a new model and want to give each entity class
>> its own name rather than use EOGenericRecord. I have created a new
>> builder
>> to do this using eogenerator which seems to work. However, I'd prefer
>> it to
>> be integrated in the Ant build file. Based on the info in Practical
>> WebObjects I was expecting to see a target in build.xml like <target
>> name="generate.eos" depends = "setProps"> which I'd then modify to use
>> eogenerator. However, this does not appear in my build.xml. Is this
>> correct?
>>
> yes, that is not part of WOLips/WProject. The wogen task is part of it
> and is supposed to accomplish the same thing. I have never used it so I
> have no advice on configuring it.
There is some documentation in WOLips (use Eclipse help to view it)
explaining how to set up EO generation. It took me less than 5 minutes
to figure out how it works from the documentation. Ask again if it takes
you much longer ...
>> Finally, what is the difference between Incremental & 'Use Ant' build
>> styles? I'm using Incremental; could this be relevant to the above?
>>
> One the Ant task creates a jar file and the incremental does not. The
> incremental does the minimum needed to create the resources needed for a
> successful launch. The Ant builder creates a deploy ready package. The
> incremental is faster. IIRC, that was its purpose.
Exactly. There is one other difference -- the incremental build always
flattens resources while the ant build usually doesn't.
Harald
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Dec 29 2004 - 12:24:10 EST