I used to find that subclipse slowed my 'eclipse experience' down too
much. Even with all the 'decoration' checking switched off. MAybe
subclipse has improved? I must admit that I drop down to the command
line to do most of my subversion stuff now. Oh, and I use jsvn as well -
that works pretty well. And TortoiseSVN in windows. If I have to.
But thanks for the plugin - I posted the bug on jira a while ago now.
Glad someone has made the effort.
Geoff
Anjo Krank wrote:
>
> Am 09.02.2005 um 09:44 schrieb Brendan Duddridge:
>
>> Does it matter if you're using CVS or Subversion for that? We're using
>> Subversion, but are having problems renaming .wo component directories. I
>> thought Subversion was supposed to be better at handling that?
>
>
> You can do that (svn mv foo.wo bar.wo). However, it's not worth the
> effort to do it manually. It's always easier to save the component under
> a new name and delete the old copy, because you'd also need to rename
> all the .html, .woo and .wod. I wish I knew who came up with the bright
> idea to name the content files after the component's name....
>
> And we're currently not using subclipse, the last time I tried, I
> couldn't get it to work on OSX. From your mail, I guess that it should?
>
> Cheers, Anjo
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:43:53 EST