I am all in favor of NOT flattening, and frankly don't recall what's
the deal with that.
Ulrich may know better:
http://www.objectstyle.org/woproject/lists/woproject-dev/
2005/03/0012.html
http://www.objectstyle.org/woproject/lists/woproject-dev/
2005/02/0089.html
Andrus
On Jun 29, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Andrus -- Do you know if the WebServerResources code flattened out
> for a particular reason? I don't want to check this in if it's
> going to cause pain for a bunch of people. However, this change
> makes incremental builder's behavior consistent with the ant
> builder, so it seems like it is "more correct"?
>
> ms
>
> On Jun 29, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>
>> I tested your patch and it didn't seem to do it for me ...
>> However, the patch below fixes that problem (which has been
>> bugging me for far too long :) ).
>>
>> Incidentally, this required me to change my
>> wsresources.includes.patternset from:
>> **/WhateverFolder/**
>> to
>> **/WhateverFolder/
>>
>> This should make the behavior more consistent with the way
>> Resources are handled, though (the .wo definition is pretty
>> similar to this).
>> [snip]
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 29 2005 - 16:26:46 EDT