Yep that is correct (the first part at least :) ).
ms
On Sep 7, 2005, at 11:29 PM, Greg wrote:
> I am pretty sure from looking at the source that the
> ComponentEditior has the WODEditor and HTMLEditor in it.
>
> The mpe (MultiPageEditor) has the Java editor, Component editor and
> ApiEditor in it.
>
> This stuff is really starting to rock. Mike and Uli are going to
> get pretty drunk at next years wwdc as everyone will be buying them
> beers! Keep up the great work guys.
>
> Greg
>
> On 08/09/2005, at 1:07 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
>
>
>> What is the difference between the ComponentEditor and the
>> WODEditor? Does
>> the ComponentEditor use the WODEditor?
>>
>> Dov Rosenberg
>>
>>
>> On 9/7/05 9:48 PM, "Mike Schrag" <mschra..dimension.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Is there a way to get an ApiModel for an Element Type (i.e.
>>> "WOHyperlink", a component in a framework, or a component in your
>>> project)? I want to add in API binding completion into WOD editor,
>>> but I want to make sure I'm not duplicating effort with the lookup.
>>>
>>> I'm also about just about to check in the new Wod editor. Bunch of
>>> misc changes:
>>> * Refactored to be "WodEditor" (vs "WODEditor" to match Api naming)
>>> * moved into subpackages (.wod.*)
>>> * added a new WodModel that you can get from an IDocument with
>>> WodModelUtils
>>> * updated all your component editor stuff to use the new WodModel
>>> instead of the misc wod parsing ,etc
>>> * added in reconciler support for Wods, so syntax errors are caught
>>> now (though it's not hooked into the builder, so they only show up
>>> right now when you open a wod for the first time)
>>>
>>> Next up is:
>>> * Element Type error checking (i.e. does the element type exist,
>>> does
>>> it extend the right class, etc)
>>> * Unreferenced Element Name error checking (does the element
>>> exist in
>>> the HTML file) -- This probably should be a warning, since it's
>>> technically legit to have an element name in a wod that does NOT
>>> exist in html
>>> * Missing Element Name error checking (does the html reference an
>>> element that isn't defined)
>>>
>>> I would like to do binding checks, but those are actually impossible
>>> to do I think. Any component can provide custom implementations of
>>> KVC or if binding sync is off there may not be methods at all. I
>>> believe I can validate bindings if you have an API file? Ulrich --
>>> How hard would it to implement something that actually executes the
>>> binding validations if I give you a dictionary of binding key/value
>>> pairs? Not asking you to do it, rather checking to see how hard it
>>> would be to do given your ApiModel?
>>>
>>> Oh one other thing -- I have some pretty hacky code in
>>> WodCompletionProcessor that retrieves the list of element names
>>> defined in <webobject name="xxx"> tags. Is there a cooler way to do
>>> this just using your api's?
>>>
>>> ms
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dov Rosenberg
>> Inquira Inc
>> 370 Centerpointe Circle, ste 1178
>> Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
>> (407) 339-1177 x 102
>> (407) 339-6704 (fax)
>> drosenber..nquira.com
>> AOL IM: dovrosenberg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 07 2005 - 23:53:49 EDT