Re: api support

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:36:53 EDT

  • Next message: Hordur Thordarson: "Referenced classpath provider does not exist"

    Yep ... Well, on the WOD/HTML/API at least. There's actually no
    validation that can be done for a WOD against the Java file (because
    of dynamic bindings, there's no way to know when you're binding to
    something real or not). The list of checks it does is: check for
    element names defined in HTML but not in WOD, check for element names
    defined in WOD but not in HTML, check for duplicate definition of
    element names in WOD, check for duplicate definition of binding
    names, check for existence of type names + that it is instanceof
    WOElement, and valid WOD syntax checks.

    On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:

    > What exactly does a "builder" do? The WO components are just text
    > files.
    > Does it do some type of validation on the combination WOD,HTML, Java?
    >
    > Dov Rosenberg
    >
    >
    > On 9/13/05 5:37 AM, "Mike Schrag" <mschra..dimension.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >> OK -- WOD Builder is in. Basically just do a clean build on your
    >> project and it should do its thing. I also went ahead and turned off
    >> the on-the-fly reconciling that would run as you type. I don't know
    >> that it's worth the cost given that WOD builder will go ahead and
    >> incremental build when you save the file anyway.
    >>
    >> ms
    >>
    >> On Sep 12, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Greg wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>> Having it in a builder would be great. I think the little amount of
    >>> overhead would dwarf the benefits.
    >>>
    >>> When are we going to have a realtime preview tab in the component
    >>> editor? ;-)
    >>>
    >>> Greg
    >>>
    >>> On 12/09/2005, at 9:57 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> WOD error checking still is not hooked up to a builder, so you
    >>>> only see errors for files that you have opened. Incidentally,
    >>>> would people LIKE it to be a builder? The downside is obviously
    >>>> that the time to do a build increases. Going forward, any new
    >>>> file you make will have the incremental error checking, so this is
    >>>> really only an issue for finding errors in existing projects.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:36:58 EDT