Re: WOD Feedback

From: Chuck Hill (chil..lobal-village.net)
Date: Thu Sep 15 2005 - 23:02:17 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOD Feedback"

    I'd vote no for WOElement for exactly Mike's reason.

    Chuck

    On Sep 15, 2005, at 7:55 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    > I'm open to hearing opinions here, but I just wonder if this
    > actually adds much? It's actually misleading because it produces a
    > properly "compiling" wod file that is definitely semantically
    > wrong. I think I'd personally rather end up with an error that
    > shows me I'm missing something.
    >
    > On Sep 15, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Greg wrote:
    >
    >
    >> What if it defaulted to been WOElement?
    >>
    >> On 16/09/2005, at 12:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> Which I personally would rather just complete using the
    >>> completion key binding which would autofill in YourElementName
    >>> anyway (assuming you just added a single new element name). Just
    >>> my two cents on that one.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    > 

    -- 
Practical WebObjects - a book for intermediate WebObjects developers  
who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects, or those  
who are trying to solve specific application development problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 23:02:26 EDT