Re: WOD warning after clean rebuild

From: Greg (ghuland..ramedphotographics.com)
Date: Tue Sep 27 2005 - 22:13:05 EDT

  • Next message: Greg: "WOFramework Projects"

    That is odd, I have never had utf-16 encoding set for components,
    just utf-8. I guess by dirtying both it changes it back to utf-8.

    On 28/09/2005, at 11:15 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

    > That would be a UTF-16 encoded HTML file it appears ... I checked
    > in a fix for this. I was using the old eclipse api for reading the
    > contents of a file that is InputStream-based. There is a newer API
    > that lets you query the character encoding of the file and get a
    > Reader for it.
    >
    > ms
    >
    > On Sep 27, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Greg wrote:
    >
    >
    >> The attached component is currently displaying every element as
    >> not defined. If I dirty both the html and wod, then save both then
    >> it fixes it. If I then do a clean build, it doesn't list it as a
    >> problem anymore. Very odd.
    >>
    >> g
    >>
    >>
    >> <ViewCompetition.api>
    >> <ViewCompetition.java>
    >> <ViewCompetition.wo>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 28/09/2005, at 9:58 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> Actually Ulrich got it back up today, but the version number is
    >>> actually just incremented to the same one I chose when I manually
    >>> incremented it. So when I checkin something tonight it should
    >>> bump up to 58 and we should be back in action.
    >>>
    >>> Would you mind emailing me one of your html and wod files so I
    >>> can use them as a test case? I'm wondering if there's something
    >>> subtly different in the way I'm testing compared with your actual
    >>> files?
    >>>
    >>> ms
    >>>
    >>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Greg wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> Still happening. Running 2.0.0.57. Is the build server down? I
    >>>> says there is no new version today.
    >>>>
    >>>> Greg
    >>>>
    >>>> On 28/09/2005, at 3:29 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> Hmm .. I'm not seeing this in mine. Can you try another clean
    >>>>> build? And you're running the latest build?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Greg wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> No. For example.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> html:
    >>>>>> <webobject name=ActiveImage1></webobject>
    >>>>>> wod:
    >>>>>> ActiveImage1: WOActiveImage {
    >>>>>> action = blah;
    >>>>>> filename="foo.jpg";
    >>>>>> }
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> That has a warning saying ActiveImage1 is not defined. If I
    >>>>>> put a space to dirty the file and save it, it doesn't get rid
    >>>>>> of it. If I change the element name to activeImage1 in both
    >>>>>> the html and wod, it gets rid of it.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> ....just checking something....
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If you dirty both the wod and html file and save, it rebuilds
    >>>>>> them and removes them as warnings. Changing the case does not
    >>>>>> really hide this issue, it is the dirtying of the component
    >>>>>> that fixes it, except I have to open a heap of components :-(
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Greg
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On 27/09/2005, at 2:55 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Meaning it's yelling at you because of a case sensitivity
    >>>>>>> issue with element names?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:15 AM, Greg wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> After doing a clean rebuild I now have over 500 warnings,
    >>>>>>>> all to do with the wod. (I am not sure if they were listed
    >>>>>>>> before hand)
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> There is no element named 'ActiveImage1' in your component
    >>>>>>>> HTML file BrowserSlideShow.wod
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> They are listed there. If I then rename it to activeImage1
    >>>>>>>> in both the wod and html it removes all the warnings for
    >>>>>>>> that file, as it lists all the bindings as not listed in the
    >>>>>>>> html file.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Greg
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 27 2005 - 22:13:49 EDT