Moin Mike,
do you have the time investigate the issue and provide a patch?
I'll take a look at it also.
Ulrich
Am 28.09.2005 um 17:49 schrieb Sébastien Sahuc:
> I've asked to address the find/search bug in eclipse for 3.1.1,
> here is what it's been replied. Could we have some people in the
> list vote for this ? All you have to do is go to: https://
> bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108774 then click the 'vote'
> link.
>
> Sebastien
>
> ------ Additional Comment #1 From Sebastien Sahuc 2005-09-28 11:29
> [reply] -------
> This is a showstopper for any MPE plugin such as WOLips. Could we
> address that for 3.1.1 ?
>
> ------- Additional Comment #2 From Paul Webster 2005-09-28 11:39
> [reply] -------
> 3.1.1 has had RC2, I don't think we are submitting any more code.
>
> PW
>
> ------- Additional Comment #3 From Michael Van Meekeren 2005-09-28
> 11:42 [reply] -------
> I suppose if a patch were to appear today or tomorrow we could
> consider but at
> this point it is not on the plan. Does anyone have time to
> investigate?
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Sébastien Sahuc wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike,
>>
>> Comments very well appreciated. Will keep an eye on the eclipse bug.
>>
>> Sebastien
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> Search not working is a show stopper in anyone's opinion, which
>>> is why you'll notice that there is no WOLips 2.0 final release.
>>> You're running off of a nightly build from the head of the CVS
>>> tree on top of an unreleased version of your IDE -- not
>>> everything is going to work yet. The example you give of a
>>> successful search is in a single editor, not a multi-part editor
>>> (MPE), which is what is used for WO Component editor. I'm not
>>> saying there's not a workaround that could be done up at the
>>> WOLips level, but as far as I've been able to tell from tracing
>>> through Eclipse's text search/selection code, it's a failure in
>>> "their stuff".
>>>
>>> In the meantime, you should be able to disassociate WO/Java/HTML/
>>> etc from using WO Component Editor and attach them individually
>>> to their standalone counterparts. That is, you can associate WOD
>>> files with WOD Editor directly, which will allow you to search to
>>> your hearts delight.
>>>
>>> ms
>>>
>>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 6:41 PM, Sébastien Sahuc wrote:
>>>
>>>>> 2) This is an Eclipse 3.1.1 bug
>>>>
>>>> --> Can't search inside WOD And HTML is a show stopper IMHO. And
>>>> I'm curious to hear why you think it's an Eclipse 3.1.1 bug.
>>>> Indeed when I open of the .wod with the text editor , or
>>>> the .html with the HTML editor, the search works just fine. It's
>>>> ONLY when using the WO editor that the search fails. Again, this
>>>> is a REAL problem and from what I see it looks like limited to
>>>> WOLips plugin. Is there any bug open elsewhere on that subject
>>>> (both woproject and eclipse ) ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Sebastien
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 3) There error is actually that it's either missing or doesn't
>>>>> extend WOElement ... It's possible the parser's not able to
>>>>> FIND the class for some reason. Can you send me what the
>>>>> hierarchy for that class looks like and if there's anything
>>>>> kind of weird about the location of the source file that is
>>>>> referenced relative to the wod (i.e. in a framework, in a weird
>>>>> folder, etc?)
>>>>>
>>>>> ms
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 20, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just updated to build 2.0.0.53 and came across a couple of
>>>>>> weird errors:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every other time I recompile and rebuild my project – the WOD
>>>>>> parser errors either show up or disappear.
>>>>>> Can’t search inside the WOD or HTML
>>>>>> Some components in my project cause the WOD Parser to flag
>>>>>> errors indicating that a referenced component does not extend
>>>>>> WOElement. All of our components extend WOComponent or some
>>>>>> descendent thereof
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dov Rosenberg
>>>>>> Conviveon/Inquira
>>>>>> Knowledge Management Experts
>>>>>> http://www.conviveon.com
>>>>>> http://www.inquira.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Sep 28 2005 - 12:29:02 EDT