Re: requests?

From: Chuck Hill (chil..lobal-village.net)
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:51:57 EDT

  • Next message: James Cicenia: "Re: requests?"

    The real question here is what happens when the new WO builder which
    is part of Xcode becomes the one to use? I guess we can stick with
    the old one but the new one promises to have some very tempting
    features.

    Chuck

    On Oct 6, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Colin Shreffler wrote:

    > I agree, I like WOBuilder and would like to see better support for it.
    >
    >
    >> Well, I don't really want to abandon WOBuilder because I like being
    >> able to drag and drop bindings, but it would be nice if WOLips
    >> provided a service to WOBuilder so we don't have to have Xcode
    >> running. Now that's the holy grail! :-)
    >>
    >> ____________________________________________________________________
    >> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
    >>
    >> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    >> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
    >> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    >>
    >> http://www.clickspace.com
    >>
    >> On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Ian McDougall wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>> One of the features I like best about WOBuilder is the ability to
    >>> create instance variables and method stubs for wod entries that
    >>> don't have a corresponding value in the class file. I normally
    >>> spend time mocking up the UI, and when I get to the java file, I
    >>> fill in the blanks.
    >>>
    >>> How about a contextual menu 'Create Missing Bindings...' that
    >>> allows the user to review missing binding values, and determine if
    >>> a method or variable should be created.
    >>>
    >>> That would be the final feature to make me abandon WOBuilder
    >>> completely.
    >>> _ _
    >>> Ian
    >>>
    >>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> On 05.10.2005, at 22:09 Uhr, Christian Pekeler wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> I believe most WO developers don't use the 'get'-prefix for their
    >>>>> accessor methods. It would be nice if wolips could patch all the
    >>>>> places in Eclipse that generate code to do that without 'get'.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> YESYESYESYESYES.
    >>>>
    >>>> cug
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > Thank you,
    > Colin Shreffler
    > Principal
    > 303.349.9010 - cell
    > 928.396.1099 - fax
    > colin.shreffle..arp9software.com
    >
    > Warp 9 Software, LLC.
    > 6791 Halifax Avenue
    > Castle Rock, CO 80104
    >
    > Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail may be
    > confidential
    > and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed by only the
    > individual or organization named in the e-mail address. If you are
    > not the
    > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
    > dissemination
    > or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information
    > contained herein, is strictly prohibited.
    >
    >

    -- 
    Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using WebObjects  
    and Xcode     http://www.global-village.net/wointro
    

    Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 18:52:01 EDT