Re: requests?

From: James Cicenia (jame..imijon.com)
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:38:08 EDT

  • Next message: Brendan Duddridge: "Re: requests?"

    Why can't we have the new WOBuilder. I like it... it is much more
    stable actually.

    James

    On Oct 6, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

    > The real question here is what happens when the new WO builder
    > which is part of Xcode becomes the one to use? I guess we can
    > stick with the old one but the new one promises to have some very
    > tempting features.
    >
    > Chuck
    >
    > On Oct 6, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Colin Shreffler wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >> I agree, I like WOBuilder and would like to see better support for
    >> it.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> Well, I don't really want to abandon WOBuilder because I like being
    >>> able to drag and drop bindings, but it would be nice if WOLips
    >>> provided a service to WOBuilder so we don't have to have Xcode
    >>> running. Now that's the holy grail! :-)
    >>>
    >>> ____________________________________________________________________
    >>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
    >>>
    >>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    >>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
    >>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    >>>
    >>> http://www.clickspace.com
    >>>
    >>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Ian McDougall wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> One of the features I like best about WOBuilder is the ability to
    >>>> create instance variables and method stubs for wod entries that
    >>>> don't have a corresponding value in the class file. I normally
    >>>> spend time mocking up the UI, and when I get to the java file, I
    >>>> fill in the blanks.
    >>>>
    >>>> How about a contextual menu 'Create Missing Bindings...' that
    >>>> allows the user to review missing binding values, and determine if
    >>>> a method or variable should be created.
    >>>>
    >>>> That would be the final feature to make me abandon WOBuilder
    >>>> completely.
    >>>> _ _
    >>>> Ian
    >>>>
    >>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> On 05.10.2005, at 22:09 Uhr, Christian Pekeler wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> I believe most WO developers don't use the 'get'-prefix for their
    >>>>>> accessor methods. It would be nice if wolips could patch all the
    >>>>>> places in Eclipse that generate code to do that without 'get'.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> YESYESYESYESYES.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> cug
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >> Thank you,
    >> Colin Shreffler
    >> Principal
    >> 303.349.9010 - cell
    >> 928.396.1099 - fax
    >> colin.shreffle..arp9software.com
    >>
    >> Warp 9 Software, LLC.
    >> 6791 Halifax Avenue
    >> Castle Rock, CO 80104
    >>
    >> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail may be
    >> confidential
    >> and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed by only the
    >> individual or organization named in the e-mail address. If you are
    >> not the
    >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
    >> dissemination
    >> or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information
    >> contained herein, is strictly prohibited.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    > --
    > Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using
    > WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro
    >
    > Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
    > overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
    > problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
    > practical_webobjects
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:38:16 EDT