Why can't we have the new WOBuilder. I like it... it is much more
stable actually.
James
On Oct 6, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> The real question here is what happens when the new WO builder
> which is part of Xcode becomes the one to use? I guess we can
> stick with the old one but the new one promises to have some very
> tempting features.
>
> Chuck
>
> On Oct 6, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Colin Shreffler wrote:
>
>
>
>> I agree, I like WOBuilder and would like to see better support for
>> it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Well, I don't really want to abandon WOBuilder because I like being
>>> able to drag and drop bindings, but it would be nice if WOLips
>>> provided a service to WOBuilder so we don't have to have Xcode
>>> running. Now that's the holy grail! :-)
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
>>>
>>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
>>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
>>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>>>
>>> http://www.clickspace.com
>>>
>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Ian McDougall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> One of the features I like best about WOBuilder is the ability to
>>>> create instance variables and method stubs for wod entries that
>>>> don't have a corresponding value in the class file. I normally
>>>> spend time mocking up the UI, and when I get to the java file, I
>>>> fill in the blanks.
>>>>
>>>> How about a contextual menu 'Create Missing Bindings...' that
>>>> allows the user to review missing binding values, and determine if
>>>> a method or variable should be created.
>>>>
>>>> That would be the final feature to make me abandon WOBuilder
>>>> completely.
>>>> _ _
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 05.10.2005, at 22:09 Uhr, Christian Pekeler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe most WO developers don't use the 'get'-prefix for their
>>>>>> accessor methods. It would be nice if wolips could patch all the
>>>>>> places in Eclipse that generate code to do that without 'get'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> YESYESYESYESYES.
>>>>>
>>>>> cug
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Colin Shreffler
>> Principal
>> 303.349.9010 - cell
>> 928.396.1099 - fax
>> colin.shreffle..arp9software.com
>>
>> Warp 9 Software, LLC.
>> 6791 Halifax Avenue
>> Castle Rock, CO 80104
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail may be
>> confidential
>> and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed by only the
>> individual or organization named in the e-mail address. If you are
>> not the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>> dissemination
>> or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information
>> contained herein, is strictly prohibited.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using
> WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro
>
> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
> problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
> practical_webobjects
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:38:16 EDT