I only know of one WOBuilder. There's 2 EOModelers, the app and the
Xcode plug-in. Is there a WOBuilder plug-in that I'm not seeing
somewhere?
____________________________________________________________________
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
On Oct 6, 2005, at 5:38 PM, James Cicenia wrote:
> Why can't we have the new WOBuilder. I like it... it is much more
> stable actually.
>
> James
>
> On Oct 6, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>
>
>> The real question here is what happens when the new WO builder
>> which is part of Xcode becomes the one to use? I guess we can
>> stick with the old one but the new one promises to have some very
>> tempting features.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Colin Shreffler wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I agree, I like WOBuilder and would like to see better support
>>> for it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Well, I don't really want to abandon WOBuilder because I like being
>>>> able to drag and drop bindings, but it would be nice if WOLips
>>>> provided a service to WOBuilder so we don't have to have Xcode
>>>> running. Now that's the holy grail! :-)
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> _
>>>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |
>>>> brenda..lickspace.com
>>>>
>>>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
>>>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
>>>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clickspace.com
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Ian McDougall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> One of the features I like best about WOBuilder is the ability to
>>>>> create instance variables and method stubs for wod entries that
>>>>> don't have a corresponding value in the class file. I normally
>>>>> spend time mocking up the UI, and when I get to the java file, I
>>>>> fill in the blanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about a contextual menu 'Create Missing Bindings...' that
>>>>> allows the user to review missing binding values, and determine if
>>>>> a method or variable should be created.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be the final feature to make me abandon WOBuilder
>>>>> completely.
>>>>> _ _
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05.10.2005, at 22:09 Uhr, Christian Pekeler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe most WO developers don't use the 'get'-prefix for
>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>> accessor methods. It would be nice if wolips could patch all the
>>>>>>> places in Eclipse that generate code to do that without 'get'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YESYESYESYESYES.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cug
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Colin Shreffler
>>> Principal
>>> 303.349.9010 - cell
>>> 928.396.1099 - fax
>>> colin.shreffle..arp9software.com
>>>
>>> Warp 9 Software, LLC.
>>> 6791 Halifax Avenue
>>> Castle Rock, CO 80104
>>>
>>> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail may be
>>> confidential
>>> and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed by only
>>> the
>>> individual or organization named in the e-mail address. If you
>>> are not the
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>>> dissemination
>>> or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the
>>> information
>>> contained herein, is strictly prohibited.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using
>> WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro
>>
>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
>> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
>> specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
>> practical_webobjects
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 19:43:39 EDT