http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Tutorials
Although it is a tutorial on creating an application, it does tell
you how to use some of the things in wolips.
Greg
On 10/10/2005, at 8:03 AM, Colin Shreffler wrote:
> Mike:
>
> Is there any support in WOComponent Editor to insert component
> objects via
> some utility? Or do you have to do everything manually: put the
> <webobject>
> tag in your HTML source and then define the corresponding entry in
> the woo
> file manually as well?
>
> I've been trying to get the WOBuilder integration to work while
> having xcode
> open in the back ground, but I have been running into problem after
> problem.
> In the interest of actually getting something accomplished for my
> project,
> I'm going to have to abandon it.
>
> I'm willing to give the WOComponent Editor a try as it seems to be
> the most
> supported way of doing things in WOLips. Are there tutorials out
> there that
> would help me?
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
>
>
> On 10/9/05 8:10 AM, "Mike Schrag" <mschra..dimension.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm curious to hear some feedback on the new changes for wod editor:
>>
>> 1) I added support for bindings for api files that define types (like
>> number format, date format) like WOBuilder has -- It will offer "%m/%
>> d/%Y", etc for date types. The issue w/ this is that you take a
>> performance hit to lookup the API file for the current type. So
>> feedback #1 is whether you feel like the performance on binding value
>> completion is too slow now? Note that there is only a performance
>> difference prior to the first '.', since static bindings would never
>> be offered as a second, third, etc key path segment. So if you
>> would, do some binding value completions before the update so you get
>> a feel for how fast it is now, then update and see if it's annoying.
>>
>> 2) To try to speed things up, I am now caching API files. The
>> downside of this is that I'm not currently watching for api file
>> CHANGES. The cache is per-editor, so when you open a new Component
>> Editor, you'll get a new cache for that file. So feedback #2 is
>> whether you notice cache freshness issues with binding NAME
>> completion from API files.
>>
>> 3) I no longer show protected or private fields during binding
>> completion. I think this is more correct and cleans up the list a
>> lot. I also no longer show completions starting with an underscore
>> unless you actually TYPE a leading underscore. It appears that every
>> binding with a leading _ generally doesn't want to be shown by
>> default. If this is NOT true, let me know and I can turn this back
>> off. It seems to make the list better.
>>
>> 4) Lastly, for binding value key path completion, if the type of a
>> keypath segment is WOApplication, WOSession, or WODirectAction,
>> instead of showing methods for the supertype hierarchy, I show
>> methods from the ENTIRE type hierarchy (including subtype hierarchy)
>> for that class in the current project. This allows me to show
>> bindings for your Application and Session SUBCLASS rather than just
>> WOSession and WOApplication's bindings. Let me know if this presents
>> a problem as it's definitely a bit of a guessing game to figure out.
>>
>> ms
>>
>>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Colin Shreffler
> Principal
> 303.349.9010 - cell
> colin.shreffle..arp9software.com
>
> Warp 9 Software, LLC.
> 6791 Halifax Avenue
> Castle Rock, CO 80104
>
> Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail may be
> confidential
> and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed by only the
> individual or organization named in the e-mail address. If you are
> not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination
> or copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information
> contained herein, is strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Oct 09 2005 - 18:56:49 EDT