Hellloooo?
I'm *really* *not* happy with this. I appreciate the work that Mike
(and Ulrich of course, too) has done and all, but there are a ton of
issues with the WodClipse plugin which is breaking our workflow (yes,
I'll write bug reports in due time).
So I don't feel confident that pulling yet *another* 40MB of
unsupported stuff is a particular bright idea. A bit more open
discussion as to what is planned and why it is needed wouldn't be bad.
Otherwise for the convenience of our present users, we should make a
branch that supports the current 3.1 eclipse and has a stable
[whatever feature set] so they/we can keep on doing whatever they do
instead of wondering about failing launches and the like.
The build right before the wodclipse stuff seemed pretty stable, so
can't we make a release from that?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 02.11.2005 um 10:10 schrieb Anjo Krank:
> Uhm, last time I checked, there was no support for OSX in TPTP? So
> what do we need it for?
>
> Cheers, Anjo
>
> Am 29.10.2005 um 12:57 schrieb Ulrich Köster:
>
>> Moin list,
>>
>> if you're not building from source ignore this message.
>>
>> SDK:http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/tptp/4.1.0/
>> TPTP-4.1.0-200509090100/tptp.sdk-TPTP-4.1.0-200509090100.zip
>>
>> Runtime:http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/tptp/
>> 4.1.0/TPTP-4.1.0-200509090100/tptp.runtime-
>> TPTP-4.1.0-200509090100.zip
>>
>> WOLips should build fine against both.
>>
>> SDK is required when you plan to enhance the features in WOLips.
>>
>> Runtime for WOLips User.
>>
>>
>> Uli
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Nov 03 2005 - 18:55:42 EST