> For me it's a really bad idea to reinvent the wheel again. First we
> create an html editor with coloring. After that formatting, code
> completion, validation an so on. I don't have the time to create
> all that stuff.
>
> For instance, I'll use the code completion in the html editor to
> select a wodentry of a given weboject tag. Were just at the
> beginning of the integration.
>
Is this nice "CSS Editor" part of WTP ? I have no idea and am too
lazy to ask google but i must agree that reinventing the wheel does
not make so much sense. And at least for me everything is working
fine, i have nothing to complain. Of course, i do not want to compile
wolips because of the nightly build server. For those who want to
compile it these dependencies might be awful but its not impossible
to solve the issues as there are people who can compile wolips, so
with a little bit of help all the others who complain having problems
compiling it should be able to fix the issues.
For those of us who are simple 'consumers' like me its great to have
a good html and css editor and i really appreciate all the code
completion for html and css, no matter from which plugin they come.
just my 2 ct.
David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Nov 05 2005 - 08:05:52 EST