Re: Building eclipse requires tptp

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun Nov 13 2005 - 03:24:40 EST

  • Next message: Ulrich Köster: "Re: Adding frameworks?"

    Am 05.11.2005 um 20:28 schrieb Anjo Krank:

    >
    > Am 05.11.2005 um 12:14 schrieb Ulrich Köster:
    >>> If it makes sense, I'm not against TPTP integration. But from
    >>> what I saw a few weeks ago, there is no "collector" part for OSX
    >>> so the whole project isn't really useful on that platform. And so
    >>> - in turn - I'm reluctant to drag in these multi-MB plugins
    >>> without any clear gain. If TPTP/hyades actually works on OSX then
    >>> great! But please tell me how...
    >>
    >> One step after the other. The tptp stuff in WOLips is a feature.
    >> TPTP is required to build WOLips not to deploy and use WOLips.
    >
    > So it's gonna to be replacement of the jmechanic stuff. OK, but how
    > exactly is this going to work? Again: last time I checked there was
    > no support to run on OSX because of some issues with native code
    > that made the collector part not easily doable. Do you have more
    > insight on when or how is is going to actually work?

    http://objectstyle.org/woproject/lists/woproject-dev/2005/10/0112.html

    >
    >>> This may or may not be related with the WOD plugin. It's just
    >>> that these issues make it a pain to edit components - more than
    >>> before all the enhancements, where you'd simply open WOBuilder
    >>> through the "Related" view.
    >>
    >> You're still able to do that.
    >
    > Sure. Just have to keep reminding myself that I can do this by un-
    > assigning the multi part and re-assign the individual editors.
    >
    >>> I'm not really complaining though, the WOD validation alone is
    >>> priceless and has helped us improve code quality quite a lot. But
    >>> still, actually editing stuff is rather messy at the moment, so
    >>> I'd prefer to things to stabilize a bit before adding TPTP just
    >>> for fun...
    >> As you've mentioned before, there a lot of thing to be fixed in
    >> wtp and eclipse. 3.2m3 has a lot of fixes related to the
    >> multiwhatevereditor. The WTP is also very busy. Instead of waiting
    >> for them, Ive decided to spend some time for the tptp integration.
    >> As you may know, we have to find a replacement for jmechanic.
    >
    > Actually I didn't know. It was just a few weeks ago that I really
    > tried the jmechanic plugin in the first place. Lots of crashes
    > related to some swing stuff not working, but otherwise halfway
    > usable:) You just need to keep in mind which views you just can´t
    > open.
    >
    > Cheers, Anjo



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Nov 13 2005 - 03:24:41 EST