I think the way it handles branches and copies is far superior to CVS.
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:05 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
> But where is the advantage?
>
> Uli
> Am 24.04.2006 um 04:49 schrieb Brendan Duddridge:
>
>> Me too!
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________
>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
>>
>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>>
>> http://www.clickspace.com
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>
>>> I would vote for that
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> On 23-Apr-06, at 9:26 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why not migrate to Subversion at the same time! :)
>>>>
>>>> Ken
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Per our private conversation with WOLips committers I am going
>>>>> to migrate CVS from SourceForge to ObjectStyle.
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Please do not commit code until further notice!
>>>>>
>>>>> I just tagged the repository with "cvs_objectstyle_migration"
>>>>> tag and planning the actual migration to happen around 7 AM GMT
>>>>> tomorrow, Monday. But this can be postponed if SourceForge
>>>>> fails to make a fresh CVS tarball by then.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll send a note once the migration is done.
>>>>>
>>>>> All committers, please send me your SSH public keys (I think I
>>>>> have Ulrich's already).
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 06:46:51 EDT