We moved a large WO project from CVS to Subversion and have been happy with it. However, we did notice that Subversion and Subclipse were extremely slow in synchronizing when we ran it through Apache. It also ate up a lot of CPU. We switched to the standalone SVN installation and it was much faster (comparable to CVS). Maybe it was something we did wrong with the Apache install.
- David
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Schrag [mailto:mschra..dimension.com]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:00 AM
To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
Subject: Re: CVS migration note
Yeah, I agree ... Since you're going above-and-beyond the call of
duty by hosting, if SVN is less pain for you, I say go for it.
However, I don't currently use SVN. What "features" of the
Subversion Eclipse plugins should I prepare to get really annoyed with?
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
> If it makes life easier for you I'm for it.
> Am 24.04.2006 um 09:29 schrieb Andrus Adamchik:
>
>> Beware that "CVS vs. Subversion" is the #1 cause of flame wars in
>> many developer communities lately ;-)
>>
>> I personally don't care either way as a programmer (both work),
>> but from the server maintenance perspective I'd prefer SVN because
>> of better permissions control, integration with Apache and most
>> operations performance.
>>
>> Or so I think, as I've never run it on the server myself. But I
>> ran CVS and it is rather inflexible. The only way of access I am
>> comfortable with is SSH tunneling by trusted users.
>>
>> My $0.02 - like I said either way is fine with me.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
>>
>>> But where is the advantage?
>>>
>>> Uli
>>> Am 24.04.2006 um 04:49 schrieb Brendan Duddridge:
>>>
>>>> Me too!
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>> _
>>>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |
>>>> brenda..lickspace.com
>>>>
>>>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
>>>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
>>>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clickspace.com
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would vote for that
>>>>>
>>>>> Pierre
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23-Apr-06, at 9:26 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not migrate to Subversion at the same time! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Per our private conversation with WOLips committers I am
>>>>>>> going to migrate CVS from SourceForge to ObjectStyle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Please do not commit code until further notice!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just tagged the repository with "cvs_objectstyle_migration"
>>>>>>> tag and planning the actual migration to happen around 7 AM
>>>>>>> GMT tomorrow, Monday. But this can be postponed if
>>>>>>> SourceForge fails to make a fresh CVS tarball by then.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll send a note once the migration is done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All committers, please send me your SSH public keys (I think
>>>>>>> I have Ulrich's already).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Ulrich Köster
>
> Assense Software Solutions GmbH
> Stadtdeich 27
> 20097 Hamburg
>
> Fernsprecher: +49 (0)40 3037579-0
> Fernkopierer: +49 (0)40 3037579-9
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 08:17:40 EDT