Re: CVS migration note

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:03:44 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CVS migration note"

    We could do some cleanup then. Making the 'projects' folder the root.
    Am 24.04.2006 um 15:56 schrieb Mike Schrag:

    > I only ever work on HEAD, personally ... I'm OK saying that if you
    > want old versions, you need to go back to the old SF CVS. How does
    > everyone else feel about that?
    >
    > On Apr 24, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>
    >>> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
    >>
    >> Ok, this is worse than I thought. Tarball that I got from SF is
    >> dated March 27 (i.e. before SF had its last meltdown). So what do
    >> you think - should we wait (potentially weeks or months) till SF
    >> restores the backups, or should we just do a fresh check in from
    >> HEAD? Are there any active branches at the moment?
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:03:49 EDT