Ok, I'll start the import then.
Since SVN allows renaming directories for real, I guess I'll import
code from HEAD (from my yesterday migration tag) to have a clean
cutoff point, and then we can do the renaming.
Stay tuned.
Andrus
On Apr 24, 2006, at 6:03 PM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
> We could do some cleanup then. Making the 'projects' folder the root.
> Am 24.04.2006 um 15:56 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>
>> I only ever work on HEAD, personally ... I'm OK saying that if you
>> want old versions, you need to go back to the old SF CVS. How
>> does everyone else feel about that?
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>>> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
>>>
>>> Ok, this is worse than I thought. Tarball that I got from SF is
>>> dated March 27 (i.e. before SF had its last meltdown). So what do
>>> you think - should we wait (potentially weeks or months) till SF
>>> restores the backups, or should we just do a fresh check in from
>>> HEAD? Are there any active branches at the moment?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:14:22 EDT