Re: CVS migration note

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:14:19 EDT

  • Next message: Brendan Duddridge: "Re: CVS migration note"

    Ok, I'll start the import then.

    Since SVN allows renaming directories for real, I guess I'll import
    code from HEAD (from my yesterday migration tag) to have a clean
    cutoff point, and then we can do the renaming.

    Stay tuned.

    Andrus

    On Apr 24, 2006, at 6:03 PM, Ulrich Köster wrote:

    > We could do some cleanup then. Making the 'projects' folder the root.
    > Am 24.04.2006 um 15:56 schrieb Mike Schrag:
    >
    >> I only ever work on HEAD, personally ... I'm OK saying that if you
    >> want old versions, you need to go back to the old SF CVS. How
    >> does everyone else feel about that?
    >>
    >> On Apr 24, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
    >>>
    >>> Ok, this is worse than I thought. Tarball that I got from SF is
    >>> dated March 27 (i.e. before SF had its last meltdown). So what do
    >>> you think - should we wait (potentially weeks or months) till SF
    >>> restores the backups, or should we just do a fresh check in from
    >>> HEAD? Are there any active branches at the moment?
    >>>
    >>> Andrus
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 10:14:22 EDT