Oh Ya... just remember to change the preference in Eclipse to use the
pure Java implementation. The JavaHL library didn't work (at least
not on my MacBook Pro).
____________________________________________________________________
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
On Apr 24, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Brendan Duddridge wrote:
> We've had great success with the Subclipse plugin for Eclipse. It's
> really good.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
>
> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>
> http://www.clickspace.com
>
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I agree ... Since you're going above-and-beyond the call of
>> duty by hosting, if SVN is less pain for you, I say go for it.
>> However, I don't currently use SVN. What "features" of the
>> Subversion Eclipse plugins should I prepare to get really annoyed
>> with?
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
>>
>>> If it makes life easier for you I'm for it.
>>> Am 24.04.2006 um 09:29 schrieb Andrus Adamchik:
>>>
>>>> Beware that "CVS vs. Subversion" is the #1 cause of flame wars
>>>> in many developer communities lately ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I personally don't care either way as a programmer (both work),
>>>> but from the server maintenance perspective I'd prefer SVN
>>>> because of better permissions control, integration with Apache
>>>> and most operations performance.
>>>>
>>>> Or so I think, as I've never run it on the server myself. But I
>>>> ran CVS and it is rather inflexible. The only way of access I am
>>>> comfortable with is SSH tunneling by trusted users.
>>>>
>>>> My $0.02 - like I said either way is fine with me.
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But where is the advantage?
>>>>>
>>>>> Uli
>>>>> Am 24.04.2006 um 04:49 schrieb Brendan Duddridge:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Me too!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |
>>>>>> brenda..lickspace.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
>>>>>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
>>>>>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.clickspace.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would vote for that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pierre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23-Apr-06, at 9:26 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not migrate to Subversion at the same time! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Per our private conversation with WOLips committers I am
>>>>>>>>> going to migrate CVS from SourceForge to ObjectStyle.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** Please do not commit code until further notice!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just tagged the repository with
>>>>>>>>> "cvs_objectstyle_migration" tag and planning the actual
>>>>>>>>> migration to happen around 7 AM GMT tomorrow, Monday. But
>>>>>>>>> this can be postponed if SourceForge fails to make a fresh
>>>>>>>>> CVS tarball by then.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll send a note once the migration is done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All committers, please send me your SSH public keys (I
>>>>>>>>> think I have Ulrich's already).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>
>>> Ulrich Köster
>>>
>>> Assense Software Solutions GmbH
>>> Stadtdeich 27
>>> 20097 Hamburg
>>>
>>> Fernsprecher: +49 (0)40 3037579-0
>>> Fernkopierer: +49 (0)40 3037579-9
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 11:05:11 EDT