Yeah, I wouldn't expect this one to happen either.
On May 2, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
> No thanks. WOLips is pretty huge and has enhancements for a lot of
> features. I for my part wouldn't want to support yet another
> platform...
>
> Cheers, Anjo
>
> Am 02.05.2006 um 16:16 schrieb JR Ruggentaler:
>
>> M6 works but RC1 and RC2 are flaky.
>>
>> Has anyone given any taught to supporting Netbeans 5.0+ for WO
>> development? I imported a large WO project into NB 5.0 and built
>> it using ant + WOProject ant jar. Netbeans seems to have improved
>> their module/plugin wizards... If NB is stable it may be a good
>> alternative to eclipse.
>>
>> J.R.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anjo Krank [mailto:kran..ogicunited.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:04 AM
>> To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
>> Subject: Re: Eclipse >M5 very flaky
>>
>>
>> Well... I don't know if I should be happy that I'm not just imagining
>> things or alarmed because this was also my impression. I'll also try
>> RC2 today.
>>
>> How about our Windows brethren? Does Eclipse/WOLips work ok for you?
>>
>> Cheers, Anjo
>>
>> Am 02.05.2006 um 15:47 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>>
>>> Yes .. I was thinking this just this morning. I can't tell if this
>>> is that Eclipse >M5 sucks or Eclipse >M5 is not as compatible with
>>> WOLips. It's driving me crazy at the moment. I just downloaded
>>> RC2 to see if these problems go away. They have been steadily
>>> getting WORSE with each of these milestone releases the past
>>> couple. It's making me nervous about the final release of 3.2. I
>>> was planning on spending some time today getting back into WOlips
>>> world to see if I could troubleshoot.
>>>
>>> On May 2, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> is it just me or are all Eclipse builds > M5 pretty rough to use?
>>>> Breakpoints don't display correctly, copy/paste sometimes doesn't
>>>> work, installing WOLips isn't very straightforward anymore etc.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder how much of this is due to WOLips and how much due to
>>>> Eclipse proper and the dependencies. Can we expect a smoother
>>>> version once Eclipse 3.2 final ships? Any ideas or estimates?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Anjo
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 02 2006 - 10:54:25 EDT