We had all kinds of network issues yesterday (just moved to our new
offices), so I didn't actually get to work on this ... Hopefully
today is the day. Just wanted to keep you guys posted.
ms
On May 8, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Working on it today ... The new server it's on doesn't have
> developer installed, so I'll build it here and rsync the build
> products up instead of actually building on that server. Sorry for
> the annoyance.
>
> ms
>
> On May 8, 2006, at 8:58 AM, Jake Fisher wrote:
>
>> Is the site up yet. I have been looking for a recent nightly build to
>> try but both 'www.mdimension.com/~wolips ' and
>> xmd.mdimension.com/~wolips show their last time stamp as April 28th,
>> 2006. And as far as I have been able to follow from recent posts that
>> particular build from 28th does not play nice with RC2.
>>
>> Thanks for all the great work,
>>
>> ~jake
>>
>> On 5/2/06, Mike Schrag <mschra..dimension.com> wrote:
>>> We have been moving wolips and wonder over to another machine ... I
>>> just checked from my machine and it's up -- Can you try again? It
>>> might be that DNS updates have not totally propagated yet. You can
>>> try xmd.mdimension.com/~wolips (which is the new machine it's on) if
>>> you need it more quickly.
>>>
>>> ms
>>>
>>> On May 2, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Jake Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> > It seems that http://www.mdimension.com/~wolips is down is this
>>> > correct?
>>> >
>>> > ~jake
>>> >
>>> > On 5/2/06, Anjo Krank <kran..ogicunited.com> wrote:
>>> >> No thanks. WOLips is pretty huge and has enhancements for a
>>> lot of
>>> >> features. I for my part wouldn't want to support yet another
>>> >> platform...
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers, Anjo
>>> >>
>>> >> Am 02.05.2006 um 16:16 schrieb JR Ruggentaler:
>>> >>
>>> >> > M6 works but RC1 and RC2 are flaky.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Has anyone given any taught to supporting Netbeans 5.0+ for WO
>>> >> > development? I imported a large WO project into NB 5.0 and
>>> built it
>>> >> > using ant + WOProject ant jar. Netbeans seems to have improved
>>> >> > their module/plugin wizards... If NB is stable it may be a good
>>> >> > alternative to eclipse.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > J.R.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>>> >> > From: Anjo Krank [mailto:kran..ogicunited.com]
>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:04 AM
>>> >> > To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
>>> >> > Subject: Re: Eclipse >M5 very flaky
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Well... I don't know if I should be happy that I'm not just
>>> >> imagining
>>> >> > things or alarmed because this was also my impression. I'll
>>> also
>>> >> try
>>> >> > RC2 today.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > How about our Windows brethren? Does Eclipse/WOLips work ok for
>>> >> you?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cheers, Anjo
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Am 02.05.2006 um 15:47 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Yes .. I was thinking this just this morning. I can't tell if
>>> >> this
>>> >> >> is that Eclipse >M5 sucks or Eclipse >M5 is not as
>>> compatible with
>>> >> >> WOLips. It's driving me crazy at the moment. I just
>>> downloaded
>>> >> >> RC2 to see if these problems go away. They have been steadily
>>> >> >> getting WORSE with each of these milestone releases the past
>>> >> >> couple. It's making me nervous about the final release of
>>> 3.2. I
>>> >> >> was planning on spending some time today getting back into
>>> WOlips
>>> >> >> world to see if I could troubleshoot.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On May 2, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> All,
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> is it just me or are all Eclipse builds > M5 pretty rough
>>> to use?
>>> >> >>> Breakpoints don't display correctly, copy/paste sometimes
>>> doesn't
>>> >> >>> work, installing WOLips isn't very straightforward anymore
>>> etc.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> I wonder how much of this is due to WOLips and how much
>>> due to
>>> >> >>> Eclipse proper and the dependencies. Can we expect a smoother
>>> >> >>> version once Eclipse 3.2 final ships? Any ideas or estimates?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Cheers, Anjo
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 09 2006 - 07:18:52 EDT