Re: Which Eclipse version is stable and universal?

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Tue May 09 2006 - 11:35:01 EDT

  • Next message: Anjo Krank: "Re: Which Eclipse version is stable and universal?"

    I'm on 3.2RC2 and pretty happy with it. Avoid M6 like the plague.

    On May 9, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Brendan Duddridge wrote:

    > I'm using 3.2M5a also. I haven't had many issues with it. But I'm
    > using WO 5.3.1.
    >
    > ____________________________________________________________________
    > Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | brenda..lickspace.com
    >
    > ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    > Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
    > Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    >
    > http://www.clickspace.com
    >
    > On May 9, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
    >
    >> Since he's looking for Intel, that won't help him.
    >>
    >> I'm running 3.2m5a which is working PRETTY well, but it still has
    >> some odd debugging issues, etc.
    >>
    >>
    >> On May 9, 2006, at 10:22 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:
    >>
    >>> I'm using eclipse 3.1.2 with WOLips 1.1.0.109, and I only use the
    >>> core WOLips fetaure. This is with WO 5.1.4 on a Mac.
    >>>
    >>> There are a few error messages that pop up now and then, but
    >>> everything seems to work.
    >>>
    >>> /Anders
    >>>
    >>> Guido Neitzer wrote:
    >>>> Hi.
    >>>> Which versions of Eclipse/WOLips are recommended for the use
    >>>> with a MacBook Pro? I would prefer to have a stable version -
    >>>> like a universal 3.1.x build of Eclipse with some old WOLips.
    >>>> Sadly it's not my MBP - so it's even more important to have a
    >>>> version that runs without too much problems.
    >>>> Are there recommendations?
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>> cug
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> http://ojalgo.org/
    >>>
    >>> Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 09 2006 - 11:35:07 EDT