Re: subversive vs subclipse

From: Sébastien Sahuc (lis..ahuc.net)
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 12:53:23 EDT

  • Next message: Pierre Frisch: "Latest Build does not generate XCode project"

    I actually have the opposite experience. It seems faster to me
    overall. I like the fact that you need to explicitely mark your
    project as Shared because it kicks in. It comes handy as some folks
    from my team don't want to use the svn plugin at all. Subclipse
    wouldn't let them do that.

    Sebastien

    On May 19, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Christian Pekeler wrote:

    > I've been using subversive since Friday after having used subclipse
    > for several month. subversive seems slower, and it failed
    > committing with NPEs about four times since yesterday. Dunno how
    > much of this can be attributed to Eclipse 3.2, but I'm switching
    > back to subclipse for now.
    >
    >
    > Christian
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 19 2006 - 12:53:26 EDT