No problem ... Honestly I don't know which one is right, anyway, so
it's hard to say it's not working right now. It was an easy enough
fix, so it's more of a theoretical discussion at this point, and
whether .html/.wo/.wod's not being resource type is going to cause
issues for other places. I don't know that it matters, though.
ms
On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:46 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
> Moin Mike,
>
> sorry for the late answer. The main reason is the "PB.PROJECT". We
> could change the behaviour if required.
>
> Uli
> Am 22.06.2006 um 01:11 schrieb Mike Schrag:
>
>> By the way, the default include patternset is **/*.wo/, so
>> TECHNICALLY I believe it's behaving correctly based on the default
>> include path? It's unclear whether that should automatically
>> apply to its contents since the folder itself matches. From the
>> resource copying perspective, it does -- copying the .wo folder
>> also is copying its children, which probably implies that its
>> children are thus also resource type? But that is SPECIFICALLY
>> why it's not working the way it was.
>>
>> ms
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 28 2006 - 08:17:54 EDT