Re: EOModeler editor file association

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2006 - 07:01:44 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "editor actions/action sets/etc"

    OK this will be fixed in the next commit ... I didn't have a check
    for isFlattened prior to checking for a missing destination. Still
    not sure why that would mark your models modified, though.

    On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Pierre Frisch wrote:

    > Please note that the Prototypes model is in a separate Framework.
    > The two mentioned relationships are flatten relationships from a
    > many to many so they should not have a destination entity in the
    > plist. They are part of the AdControl model.
    >
    > For some reason all the models I open (except the prototypes) are
    > dirty. I would be surprised if they all had errors but it is possible.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Pierre
    >
    > <Picture 6.png>
    >
    > <AdControl.eomodeld>
    > <Prototypes.eomodeld>
    > <CustomerAccess.eomodeld>
    > <BlackPressDirectory.eomodeld>
    >
    > On 12-Jul-06, at 7:50 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >
    >> What error did you get with the flattened relationship, out of
    >> curiosity? If your model shows up as modified right after
    >> loading, it is probably because it found a duplicate name and did
    >> an automatic rename ... Just a guess.
    >>
    >> ms
    >>
    >> On Jul 12, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
    >>
    >>> Yes I finally understood what it was when I opened a model with a
    >>> flatten relationship and it came up with an error message. To my
    >>> knowledge this is a valid model but I would not venture too far
    >>> since lat time.
    >>>
    >>> Pierre
    >>>
    >>> On 12-Jul-06, at 8:19 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> I just realized what you're seeing .. I've been testing models
    >>>> with errors intentionally placed in them. Normally this window
    >>>> opens and shows you model errors, but I forgot to skip it if
    >>>> there aren't errors (and didn't notice because my test case
    >>>> models are all broken). This will be fixed in the next commit.
    >>>>
    >>>> On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> It pops up a blank window
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 13 2006 - 07:01:52 EDT