Mike, did you get clarification on the WebObjects Deployment license?
gw
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Schrag [mailto:mschra..dimension.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:24 PM
To: woproject-de..bjectstyle.org
Subject: Re: Normalizing EOModel plists and avoiding CVS merge conflicts
Let it be so ... I just merged Marc's patch with Cayenne and updated
Eclipse EOModeler to write with it. So EOModels all produce
consistently ordered output now.
ms
On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:44 AM, mar..iffy-berlin.in-berlin.de wrote:
>
>> On 17. Jul. 2006, at 17:24, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, we use Cayenne's plist serializer, and that would be very handy
>>> to have. In fact, it would be particularly handy for me because I
>>> need to do equality tests between old EOModeler and new EOModeler
>>> but their order is all different. It makes using diff a
>>> non-starter.
>>
>
> I just had a vision: an EOModeler that writes plists in a
> deterministic fashion. Wow. Now THAT would be cool! :-P
>
>
> --
> Coming sometime... - an introduction to web applications using
> WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro
>
> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
> problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
> practical_webobjects
>
>
>
>
Confidential & Privileged
Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the information contained in this communication is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product. This communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or otherwise--which you may have of this communication.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jul 17 2006 - 14:29:36 EDT