Re: Entity Modeler fetch specs

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Wed Jul 26 2006 - 10:42:17 EDT

  • Next message: Anjo Krank: "Re: Entity Modeler fetch specs"

    What information would you want to store in the model? .eogen files
    can contain multiple models (sort of like composite indexes), so we
    can't really put configuration information into a single eomodel --
    it has to live in something above the model level.

    On Jul 26, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Watkins, Garry wrote:

    > This is just a note of warning if you are using eogenerator to
    > generate static methods that call fetch specifications. Since the
    > new Entity Modeler now orders the plists, eogenerator is reordering
    > some of the parameters that are being generated, thus causing
    > method signatures to be different. To fix this I have modified my
    > eogenerator to sort the bindings array by name, therefore it will
    > always generate the method signature in the same order as long as I
    > do not add new bindings to the fetch spec. But I am going to find
    > the places where I am calling the code, to make sure it is calling
    > them correctly, for the cases where I send in multiple parameters
    > of the same type.
    >
    > I just ran into this problem, so I thought that I would warn people.
    >
    > Mike, were you doing the eogenerator modifications too? If so,
    > couldn't we use the same methodology that you are going to use for
    > indexes and to store the eogenerator parameter information in the
    > eomodel.userInfo dictionary? Then we could store the eogenerator
    > path in the wobuild.properties file.
    >
    > Thanks
    > Garry
    >
    >
    > Confidential & Privileged
    >
    > Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the
    > information contained in this communication is attorney-client
    > privileged and confidential information/work product. This
    > communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity
    > named above. If the reader of this communication is not the
    > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
    > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
    > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or
    > are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us
    > by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or
    > otherwise--which you may have of this communication.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jul 26 2006 - 10:42:29 EDT