Thanks Mike, I have checked it and it works fine.
Pierre
On 16-Aug-06, at 8:16 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> I looked at the code but I dont understand why you have a special
>> case for the column name.
> Speaking of comments ... that would have been a nice one for me to
> put a comment on. It's a slip-up -- EOM writes out "" when column
> name is missing, but this code got broken when stored procedures
> were introduced, which adds EOArgument, a sibling class to
> EOAttribute which does NOT use prototypes. The new logic is in so
> that it skips column name if there is a prototype, writes "" if
> it's missing (and not prototyped), and writes the column name if it
> actually has one that doesn't match its prototype value.
>
> ms
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Aug 16 2006 - 13:58:30 EDT