Re: Making WOLips more appealing to new users

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 12:38:32 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Schrag: "Random tidbit"

    That thing is the limit of my skills and amount-i-care-about-it :)
    If anyone wants to donate one, go to it ...

    ms

    On Aug 22, 2006, at 12:31 PM, James Cicenia wrote:

    > I think we need something a bit more Aqua/Aero ... translucent
    > like, a bit surfaced.
    >
    > And..... and this is a biggie.. time to change the name.
    > WOLips just doesn't cut it.
    >
    > A sad mouth? Woe is I? just doesn't really flow proudly and
    > confidently from these lips.
    >
    > If we rename it we can also rebrand it! Make it a completely
    > Eclipse based solution.
    > It doesn't need to even have eclipse or wo in it, i.e.,
    >
    > JACKED 2.0
    >
    > Java Application Compenent KeyValue ExtendeD. LOL
    >
    > Have a very nice installer... simple apps... and all the goodness
    > of the Eclipse work.
    >
    > my two cents
    >
    > James Cicenia
    >
    > On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
    >
    >> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home
    >>
    >> ms
    >>
    >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:49 AM, RedBugz Software wrote:
    >>
    >>> > - The icon! Where is the one from Mikes t-shirt? That looked so
    >>> > nice...
    >>> Technically that logo is derivative of both Eclipse's trademarked
    >>> logo and the EO symbol, which is quite possibly trademarked by
    >>> Apple. I don't PERSONALLY care, but I don't know how other folks
    >>> feel about it.
    >>>
    >>> ms
    >>>
    >>> I really like the Eclipse logo inside the EO shell. Judging by
    >>> other Eclipse plugins frequent use of the Eclipse logo, I'm
    >>> guessing there won't be much trouble there. Who knows about the
    >>> EO part, I'm pretty sure Apple WO folks themselves wouldn't care,
    >>> but Apple corporate/legal may have to be sticky about it for
    >>> various reasons completely unrelated to its actual use.
    >>>
    >>> Then again, I don't have any idea what the current yellow tube
    >>> squirting something WOLips logo is, so I've never connected with
    >>> it. I'm guessing it's supposed to be lipstick maybe? Or is there
    >>> some other cool or interesting history behind that logo?
    >>>
    >>> Logan
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 22 2006 - 12:38:38 EDT